However, for neither type of meat was the heterogeneity between subsites significant. The corresponding hazard ratios (95% CIs) for colon cancer were 1.1 (0.7-1.6 P for trend = 0.9) and 1.3 (0.9-1.9 P for trend = 0.06). For rectal cancer, the hazard ratios in the highest quartile of consumption of fresh red meat and processed meat were 2.3 (1.2-4.2 P for trend = 0.07) and 2.0 (1.1-3.4 P for trend = 0.09), respectively. We identified 283 colon cancers and 169 rectal cancers in an average of 9 years of follow-up. Adenocarcinomas of the colon or rectum were ascertained via the Victorian Cancer Registry. We categorized the frequency of fresh red meat, processed meat, chicken, and fish consumption into approximate quartiles. Diet was measured with a food frequency questionnaire. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 37,112 residents of Melbourne, Australia recruited from 1990 to 1994. Evidence on the relationship between risk of colorectal cancer and poultry and fish consumption is inconsistent. She reportedly settled with the chain for $522,000 in 2015.Red meat and processed meat consumption have been associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer in some, but not all, relevant cohort studies. More recently, in 2018, a lawsuit alleged a teenager was badly burned after being served hot water at an "unreasonably dangerous temperature" at a McDonald's restaurant in Oregon.Ī separate legal case had a woman filing suit against Dunkin' Donuts in New Jersey after falling in a parking lot and spilling hot coffee and burning herself. A judge later reduced the $2.7 million award to $480,000, which he said was appropriate for the "willful, wanton, reckless" and "callous" behavior by McDonald's. She had initially asked McDonald's for $20,000 to cover hospital expenses, but the company went to trial. She suffered third-degree burns and spent more than a week in the hospital. The case may stoke memories of the McDonald's coffee lawsuit of the 1990s, which became an urban legend of sorts about seemingly frivolous lawsuits, even though a jury and judge had found it anything but.Ī New Mexico jury awarded Stella Liebeck, 81, $2.7 million in punitive damages after she was scalded in 1992 by hot coffee from McDonald's that spilled onto her lap, burning her legs, groin and buttocks, as she tried to steady the cup with her legs while prying the lid off to add cream outside a drive-thru. "Our customers should continue to rely on McDonald's to follow policies and procedures for serving Chicken McNuggets safely," McDonald's said in a statement in May. Photos the mother took of the burn were shown and sound clips of the child's screams were played in court. While both sides agreed during the trial in May that the nugget caused the burns, the family's lawyers argued the temperature was above 200 degrees (93 Celsius), while the defense said it was no more than 160 degrees (71 Celsius). The company testified they follow food safety rules, which require McNuggets to be hot enough to avoid salmonella poisoning, and that what happens with the food once it leaves the drive-thru window is beyond their control. The mother testified that at no point did McDonald's warn her the food might be unusually hot. She said the girl screamed in pain, and when she pulled over in a parking lot, she realized the nugget was lodged between Oliva's thigh and the seat belt. Holmes testified she had purchased Happy Meals for her son and daughter, who was sitting in the back seat, and was driving away when the nugget fell on the child's leg. That's why our restaurant follows strict rules in accordance with food safety best practices when it comes to cooking and serving our menu items, including Chicken McNuggets," UpChurch Foods said in a statement. "Our sympathies go out to this family for what occurred in this unfortunate incident, as we hold customer safety as one of our highest priorities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |